Sunsets?

Joe Cornish, Flow of Light

I’ve just read an article in a popular outdoor photography magazine that was written in defense of shooting sunsets that I can’t help but write a reaction to.

 

He does say in the article that he knows many photographers who think that “capturing a sunset as a creative end in itself is a waste of time”. Well I think I probably fit into that category so I figure I’d best explain why.

But first of all I’ll start by stating that taking photographs of anything for any reason is perfectly valid and I wouldn’t deny anyone the right to take photographs of whatever the hell they want to take pictures of. Part of the problem in reacting for or against an article like this is in approaching the question of “why do we take photographs in the first place”. There are hundreds of answers to this I can imagine, from “because I like playing with cameras” to “I’m trying to communicate the meaning of my life” via “I like calling myself a photographer” and “I’m obsessed with coloured/black and white stuff” but I’ll try to cover a few that I think may make sense to readers of this website.

Am I taking pictures for myself or for others?

Eliot Porter, Pool in a Brook

If you are taking photographs just for yourself then there is nothing that is bad or good. The only person who matters is yourself and so the only arbiter of quality or subject is yourself. The only reason that other people may matter is if you have a self imposed peer group that you challenge yourself with. For example Vivian Meier was a street photogapher from Chicago who never showed her pictures to anybody but who obviously had a sense of ‘art’ and had various street photographers as an influence. In this case, I believe that although she never showed her art to someone else, she was definitely creating her art for herself but also for an imaginary audience of some sort

If you are taking pictures with an audience in mind (imaginary or otherwise) then the audience can be anything from a general general public who are totally unfamiliar with landscape photography (beyond the type of art that they absorb through a cultural osmosis) through various levels of art aware individuals and also to other photographers.

So is your desired audience artistically aware? Do they like the visual equivalent of pop music or jazz?

Joe Rainbow, Gunwalloe Scales

For me, and quite a few of the photographers I talk to, their primary goal through photography is to express themselves in an original and creative way and to share that with a group of artistically minded peers. There are also photographers that work primarily because it’s something they enjoy and they like a challenge to see if they can create the best photograph they can.

The two goals I’ve listed above seem quite complementary but there is a fundamental flaw in the second in that the ‘best photograph’ is a subjective thing and the audience that ends up being defaulted to is ‘other photographers’, either on photo sharing websites or camera clubs, etc. The worst thing isn’t the fact that it’s other photographers, it’s the fact that the feedback from these other photographers is given as judged in a tiny amount of time and by a small picture and, online at least, the final result is a statistical anomaly judged by how much you comment on other pictures, write about your own pictures, how often you post, etc, etc.

Now I’m not suggesting that there is anything inherently wrong with playing the camera club/photo sharing website game. The main thing to be sure of is that you are driving things, not letting it drive you. You can choose which feedback to react to and which to ignore and in the end you can gain from using these resources.

Magnus Lindbom, Rauddalen

What has all this got to do with sunsets though? Well, it’s to do with being in control of why you take photographs and having a plan of how to progress your craft.

In any craft/art, you learn the most when you are challenged the most. If as painists we stayed with 4/4 tempo in C major with octaves and fifths on the left hand then although a non-pianist may be impressed by what we can do, we will be limited in our potential for creativity. Introducing minor keys and sevenths increases the potential for musicial texture dramatically. I see sunset/sunrise pictures as the equivalent to C major (with coastal sunsets as C major 7ths to push an anology) and although they may have a place, we should be looking at balance. We should challenge ourselves to take photographs in cloudy weather or at midday, in the rain or fog. By challenging ourselves, we bring our problem solving head into action and by doing so we stand more chance of finding solutions that are unique to ourselves.

Using my musical analogy, it would be foolish to dismiss sunsets as irrelevant. Just as major chords are a significant part of much music, using the warm light of a sunset or sunrise can be a significant part of a photographers pallette. But I would say that to make something creative and original out of a sunset or sunset light you need to have a ‘plan’ – an approach that can shape the work you do rather than just reacting to the environment. Even with single pictures, if you use the the light or sunset itself as just an ingredient in a wholesome meal.

I’ve included some sunset/sunrise pictures from various artists here with a short commentary against each. All of these photographers have taken a sunrise and used it’s light in a way that creates something original and beautiful.

In Joe’s case, he has chosen to use a the glow of the sunrise as a reflection in the pools of tidal water, creating almost modernist shapes from the pebbles and shapes. Eliot Porter has done the same thing but gone even further to use the second hand light from the banks of the river and mixed it with the inky blacks of the water. The texture of the water’s flow and the scattered leaves add detail to what if one of my favourite of Eliot’s pictures. Joe Rainbow has captured an outcrop of stone that acts as a wonderful foil to the energetic water flows and dynamic skies, using the light of sunset to illuminate a magic moment. Magnus Lindbom, a photographer I found out about when he was recommending Lapland locations has captured a the raw luminosity of the sun as it breaks through the clouds above a zebra striped raw landscape.

10 Responses

  1. Joe Rainbow

    I couldn’t agree more :)

  2. Taking pictures OF sunsets is pretty dull (conjuring images of a row of compact digitals pointing at the sun with their flashes blinking away, wonky horizons).

    Illuminating your shot with the pleasing light of a sunset is a different game.

  3. I was recently in the bush in Zambia where the sunsets were mesmerising. If I had not tried to capture these sunsets I would have been mad. That said I don’t think making such images is a creative end itself – I was trying to capture the ambience of an astonishing landscape of which the sunset was an intergral part. I also make images of sunrises in this country from time to time when the orb of the rising sun is part of the mood I am trying to capture.
    Perhaps the problem is that there are too many sunset cliches which most of us will have taken on our rite of passage, where the main object of the image is record the orange ball of the sun preferably reflected on water. It is a stage most of us go through and for me I got a lot of pleasure from it at the time.

    • I agree – there is nothing inherently wrong with taking pictures of sunsets and photograpy’s role as ‘aide memoire’ is one that is incredibly important. We just need to be aware why we are doing so and if our intent is to create original artistic work, you have to work a lot harder during sunrise/sunset because of the huge amount of work already out there. The light of sunrise/sunset *is* magical but without a composition, subject and reason, it makes no more of an artistic impact than a high street firework – a quick wow and some pretty colours but, like fireworks, everyone is doing the same thing. And just like fireworks, to make something original and memorable takes a gargantuan amount of effort.

  4. LShepherd

    It took me a while to appreciate where you were coming from here – but your route to the conclusion makes sense and in so many ways I agree with you. From a commercial point of view, there is no doubt sunset (and sunrise) will always be popular and, catch a ‘good one’ and you can really experience something amazing. That said, I think I get most pleasure from images created when things aren’t so good – middle of the day, flat light, harsh light, you name it. I guess most people are not out and about at sunrise/set and I think there is much to be said for finding ways of showing people the beauty of what they do (or can) see on a daily basis, rather than what they don’t see – when they are tucked up in bed, or enjoying their evening meal!

  5. Nigel

    Sound and thoughtful advice Tim. I am reminded of an essay published in Fay Godwin’s collection of images “Land” in which John Fowles expressed views which gave me food for thought. He acknowledged that many of those who photograph landscapes have a genuine love and feeling for the subjects of their work but in this, he suggested, there was a trap. Because of their affection for the landscape, many of them naturally want to portray it at its best and this can denigrate into the photographer pitting his/her wits and expertise against the “truth” of the landscape.

    In the essay he went on to write about how this might lead to a sin which he described as analogous with making the landscape “perform” in an animal training sense, showing how clever the trainer is in what he has taught his animals. John Fowles disliked getting animals to perform and he regarded its equivalent in photography as “the hideously obtrusive and narcissistic determination to sell the photographer’s ego rather than the thing being photographed. ‘Here is a remarkable landscape – because I took it’ ”

    He wasn’t of course suggesting that all landscape photography is like this, just some of it. I have found it helpful to keep this analogy in the back of my mind when out but I also recognise that some people I know are greatly entertained by a dog walking on its hind legs and the applause of the crowd can be addictive.

  6. Rob Hudson

    Thank you Tim, another thoughtful and well structured article. It also represents a failure of artistic progression without which our photography can become stale even to ourselves, it is the major reason many give up or lose interest in photography. I would heartily recommend exposing ourselves to as wide a range of visual art as we can, and certainly beyond photography as it strikes me that the interplay between the two can suggest ideas and develop the genre further. There are possibilities we haven’t even begun to imagine for landscape photography, but we’ll find they aren’t uniquely orange.

  7. Hi All,

    An interesting article; I too initially thought that Tim was having a gentle dig at those of us who like sunsets (or sunrises for that matter). Thankfully not so. But there is perhaps a third category of photographer to add to the two who “express themselves” and “… create the best photograph”. For my part, most of the time I seek to record the beauty I see before me. Yes, I do try to show my way of seeing the object and I do try to add some compositional structure to my image rather than depending on the colours alone. But I am not sure if that falls into the category of expressing myself. Surely I am not alone in just wanting to record that which attracts me?

    As to sunsets, having captured some spectacular full-on golden orbs as well as rather subdued colours and even no sun at all, I do prefer the quieter ones as generally speaking they seem to have much more atmosphere and mystery. Perhaps it is that mystery that awakens some sort of primeval emotion which lies far deeper in us than the brief wow of a pretty picture.
    Rgds to all, Adam

    • Hi Adam,

      Yes I agree that capturing beauty is something that is something I feel very strongly about also. The definition of beauty is the interesting thing and also who you are trying to capture the beauty for, to show to someone else or as a record. Also, is the beauty inherent in the subject matter or does it arise from your ‘manipulation’ of the subject matter (through angle of view, exposure, medium, etc).

      If you are making your particular choice of sunset then that reflects part of your character. If you want to show the result then you are communicating something about yourself?

      Tim

  8. Thought provoking Tim. Got me thinking about the difference between taking photos “of” the sunrise/sunset as opposed to using the light of the “golden hour” to influence the mood of the composition. I would see these as slightly different as a good photographer will intentionally use different lights throughout the day to influence their style and/or to generate mood in an image. As you say Tim, it is originality that then truly satisfies the peers and often how “pretty” it is that pleases the more casual viewer. Satisfy both and you have a winner! Simple (in words at least!). As for me, I have to admit I still can’t resist taking a good sunset every now and then and as long as I smile as I walk home then at the end of the day that is what ultimately matters is it not?

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.