In Defence of Wow!

There has been a fair bit of sunset/rise bashing goes on in LandscapeGB and there’s been a good few debates about the virtues of flat light, contemplative compositions and all that goes with it.

I myself am a fully signed up member of the wowless club, the more I journey into the my world of photography, the more demure my images get – so getting me to sing the praises of Wow(!) photos is a bit like getting Wayne Rooney to talk about his love of ballet. But still, in a bid to try to redress the balance I thought I’d have a go at seeking out some photos which follow the rules set out in the photographic press – golden hour, sea, wooshiness and general photographic bling.

My problem with this type of photography in general is that I find it difficult to gain any lasting pleasure from what they’re offering – there’s no hidden depth, no character, no emotion imparted in them from the photographer. Landscape photography works for me is when there’s a part of the photographer’s character embedded in the image – I want to get a sense of place or emotion from an image – ideally with hidden depth – an image you have to work at and grow to love. This is quite the opposite to the general formulaic picture making that’s prevalent in most landscape photography today. These images kick you in the teeth and shout “I’m here, look at me, marvel at my many colours!” and then run off into the night to assault someone else’s eyes.

Before I head off into rant mode I’ll move on to the purpose of this article; to find some art amongst the Wows – to find some images that stand up for golden hour.

So where to start…

The first place for me was to have a look through my Flickr favourites – there must have been some that have snuck in there amongst the mist and tangled branches.

Neil Bryce

This first image is by the rather brilliant Photographer, Neil Bryce. This is a photograph that is about as Velvia as it gets. I generally don’t like the way Velvia puts so much of itself into a photo and here there’s an obvious Velvia cast to the whole image. But in this case it works adding a very saturated purple sheen. So why is this a good golden light photo in my opinion? Well, there’s a lovely well thought out composition (as you’d expect from Neil), the dynamic shape of the foreground rock leads beautifully into the image and the distant shoreline, the cottage in the far distance provides a point of interest for the eye to linger on. There’s enough in the scene to hold the attention, so much to explore. For me everything’s right about the composition and in this case the Veliva colours add to the atmosphere rather than overpowering it.

Having looked through the rest of my favourites I realised I needed to remove a lot of my earlier selections – how my tastes have refined over the years, I did find some cute kittens though!

Helen Dixon is a photographer who’s work I enjoyed early on in my foray into photography, she really encapsulates the style of populist landscape photography – generally golden hour shots, emphasised foreground interest and saturated colours. She is still one of the few digital photographers working in this style who’s work I enjoy to an extent.

Helen Dixon

From Helen’s recent work gallery here’s an image which I shouldn’t like! There’s the sun kissing the horizon, dramatic skies, foreground interest – horrible! But no, this one is a worthy Wow, the composition is delicately composed, the S curve leading from the foreground rocks out to sea is punctuated by the island out to sea, the curve is then nicely continued with the cloud formation. So many times this sort of image is ruined by lack of composition, the shiny ingredients are thought to be enough to make the photo, but no, a compositional recipe is required to make a photo work. I’d also add that with this photo the colours are saturated but they don’t push the realms of possibility, in fact it remains quite a quiet image despite it’s golden glow.

Ben Heaven

This photo by Ben Heaven is certainly a wow for me. As with Neil’s photo this one displays all the hallmarks of a Velvia photo; exaggerated greens, purple tinted sky and separated reds. A lovely composition and although the colours are, I’m sure, not “real” there’s a magical feel to the photograph in part due to the early morning mist in the valley. One of my many landscape photography rants is about the inclusion of foreground rocks just for the sake of foreground interest. Often interesting is exactly what they’re not and are just part of the prescribed formula. Here though they work so well at leading the eye into the photo and along the wall. The low angle of view also channels the eye with the collection of golden ferns completing the corridor with the wall.

I must say my seemingly simple mission to find colourful golden hour photos that moved me in some way, images that are more than technique, dramatic angles and sledgehammer post processing ended up being a massive struggle for me. Of course there’s nothing wrong with this style of photography – each to their own, but most of the time I’m left cold and somewhat depressed about the state of popular landscape photography in the UK. To finish off on a positive note here’s a rather lovely image by Baxter Bradford from one of the most photographed chunk of seaside in Britain – Porth Nanvan. This is dramatic seascape done well – a real Wow!

Baxter Bradford

8 Responses

  1. Funny, I remember last summer I switched from what you call “Wow”, when I asked myself, `how come *everyone* *feels* velvia, LF 4×5 portrait-orientation with grad-ND sky and rear tilt [etc]?’. So I’ve got at least one leg in the “bashing” camp. (Been there, woken up at 3am, got the 5am sunrises of mountains, lochs and rocks; now I value my sleep!) And you’re absolutely right that what’s lacking is individualism.

    So maybe the time comes to posit what other factors contribute to a good photograph: composition, of course – I like the mini-series here so far on “flow”, etc; *appropriate* use of light (ie it works both with the subject and the photographer’s purposes); message; other ideas? As a side-question, if this anti-establishment rebellion furthers individual expression, is there a risk that any one image will be seen only as “bad” when a series in a particular style would make more sense?

  2. (PS I quite like the latter two you’ve chosen; the ethereal misty greens and blatant water motion work for me :)

  3. The wow is gone when you get home, process your shots then do a search on flickr and see that someone else has exactly the same shots of the same rock/feature and probably caught it on a day with a better sky… that’s the back the drawing board moment. I usually give the camera a rest for a while if I start getting these shots.

  4. Good post. For what it’s worth, I think the problem is not the WOW per se, but the superficiality of some images in this genre. My favourite image in this selection is Baxter Bradford’s moody seascape. I don’t know the details, but I would say that it is (a) not shot with an ultra wide-angle lens (b) not over-saturated and (c) does not use HDR or other effects to recover extreme shadow or highlight detail. It’s such a well worn cliche, but less really is more.

  5. I deprecate the ‘wow’ or the ‘non-wow’ school of photography or any other orthodoxy that demands our adherence. Photography is not a religion and we should avoid slavishly confining ourselves to fashionable modes, however eminent their source.

  6. bax

    It was a surprise to see ‘Angry sky – Porth Nanven’ being used here. It, like all of my images certainly was made to sympathetically show off the subject matter in a manner which provides lasting enjoyment instead of short-term impact and then emptiness. I strive to choose my viewpoint carefully and present scenes in an original manner. When using film, I chose the emulsion which I felt was most in tune with the image I wanted, occasionally shooting the same scene in colour and B&W. Colour Neg was something I championed from an early stage.

    Having driven down through spectacular snow in Dorset and not stopped to make any pictures, I was worried about getting over Bodmin Moor as the following day I was leading a L&L course in West Cornwall. I went straight to Porth Nanven and was primarily concerned about the track of the huge hail storm out to sea. It was shot on my Ebony 45SU with a 110mm lens and on RVP50 (original). Water movement was by necessity (I think I fretted over aperture vs shutter speed at the time) and there are staggered grads, one over sky, other down over sea blending with foreground. I decided the rocks on LHS could go dark and haven’t subsequently made any attempt to recover detail from them. From a number of sheets this was the stand-out one, because of the light on the sea and waves.

  7. LensView

    A very interesting discussion. I think, what it all boils down to, is that there are different types of photography (comparable to different music styles, more or less noisy, like classical or hard rock). Each have their audience. I like good wow images and good quit, subtle images (as I like some classical music and some rock music).
    But, in every style you have, as Simon Miles put it, superficial images and images that go deaper and can give you something over a long time. That’s what makes the difference between an average (or even good) image and an outstanding image.

  8. I always find it odd that just because a photo has sunset/sunrise/glaoming colour elements to it that it must be (or usually is) superficial and lacks depth and meaning where as something which is subtle and apparently “considered” has depth and meaning. I do not subscribe to these views at all.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.