on Distant Horizons
It must have been rather fab to research this, and it's terrific to encounter artists involved in the genre.
- milouvision, 11:20 16th Junon Camera Survey
It might be interesting to see how the votes would stack if you asked in three months to repeat the survey, I for one missed the original request. It's a very interesting survey and nice to see that Pentax still have such a large following, likewise the medium and large format categories, [...]
- Douglas Salteri, 08:54 16th Junon Is Adobe Creative Cloud Bad For Photographers?
Great article Paul! I hope Adobe will continue to develop Photoshop with new features for photographers. I would love some new adjustment layers, how about midtone contrast (a.k.a clarity)?
- Magnus Lindbom, 07:32 16th JunThe Lineage of Fine Art and Photography
Tim Parkin
Your humble editor, ex-mathematician, A&R for U2, web developer to the Queen, guitarist and general geek-boy.
Other articles by Tim Parkin
A visit to London this weekend with my parents-in-law took me to a few different exhibitions. The Ansel Adams exhibition has already been reviewed so I’ll be writing instead about the “Seduced By Art: Photography Past and Present” exhibition at the Sainsbury Wing of the National Gallery as well as “Constable, Gainsborough, Turner and the Making of Landscape” at the Royal Academy.
The Seduced by Art exhibition’s primary purpose is to look into the ways that the themes, subjects and techniques of art have influenced photography. The exhibition features work by big hitters from the historical art and historical to contemporary photography world ranging from Goya, Degas and Delacriox through Gustave Le Grey, Fox Talbot and Roger Fenton to Richard Billingham, Thomas Struth and Jem Southam and many more; and even without the context it would have made a wonderful collection of works of art.
But it’s the context that really lifts this exhibition above the general ‘best of’ exhibits that we sometimes see and reveals some of the genealogy underlying contemporary photography. Split into Portrait, Figure, Tableau, Still Life and Landscape, each of these sections brings together the history of painting, early photography and contemporary photography and discusses the connections between them.
For example: the first room, Portrait, shows how the photographer Oscar Gustave Rejlander used Thomas Couture’s painting/engraving “The Romans during the Decadence” as inspiration for his piece “Two Ways of Life” which was a massive ‘hit’ when released to the public in 1857.
The image used many smaller study pictures and composited them in a darkroom montage to create a panoramic scene of a father showing his two sons the moral choices they have in life. Estimates of the number of studies he used vary between 30 and 50 but show just how much work was much work was involved. Rejlander’s use of historic references was common in photography of the time with practitioners eager to convince the critics that their work was more than just reproduction.




I’m glad you have put a review of this important show up Tim. The sheer wealth and diversity of work on the walls shows just how much photography has played a part in informing visual culture since its genesis. It is right to pay tribute to its heritage, which is something forgotten in today’s mass media, socially networked world!
I agree with all your comments here but feel that the exploding flowers of Ori Gersht don’t actually benefit from a deeper level of meaning. For me they worked brilliantly as a simple ‘look at me’ piece; a bold slap in the face to the arguably stuffy, formulaic still lifes of yesteryear! I totally agree, however, that Jem Southam’s work was lacking in impact, simply due to it’s location next to the rather awe-inspiring ‘Fernweh’. I would be interested to know the decisions made by the curators on that one!
One part you didn’t mention was the video room. I found it fascinating that as the moving image is becoming more prevalent in exhibited visual art, the National Gallery also saw fit to include some (albeit tucked away in a separate room!). I wonder how moving images will develop as art pieces? And how will audiences react to them; as novelties or as accepted artistic statements. Food for thought!